Talk:Atheme

From IRC Wiki
Revision as of 01:36, 2 August 2010 by MrJones (talk | contribs) (moved Talk:Atheme to Talk:Atheme IRC Services: this article is about the Atheme IRC Services, not the Atheme dev project with all its projects)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

God uses Atheme in Heaven. Atheme makes my boxers wet. <3

Quick install guide

Is that guide really necessary? I think we can expect people who read this wiki to be able to read an INSTALL file. CuleX (Talk | Contribs) 08:12, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

This article hasn't been reworked yet (compare Anope and others). We do have a tutorial section by now (since User:Bertrum loves to write tutorials) and probably it should be moved there. But given the INSTALL file contains this, it'd be rather useless duplication I guess, don't know.
Since I already went on to remove quite some of those tutorials we already had a longer discussion on this. We agreed at least so far that all that documentation stuff should be in the tutorial section (and not in regular articles). Whether it should be in this wiki at all, well, there's no guideline yet, but with the tutorial section Trixar_za decided it's supposed to have a place here aswell (so this wiki IS supposed to contain documentation/tutorials after all, but in that specific section, not in regular articles - not all articles have been reworked to reflect this though).
What really confuses me here is that the INSTALL file covers this. So this is actually redundant information if the program documents this the same way I guess. Or probably not. I really don't know, we haven't spoken about such a case yet (where a tutorial on IRC wiki just covers what the software describes itself just fine). I'll talk with Bertrum and User:Trixarian as soon as I get a hand on them about this (or maybe they'll comment here what they think)
So that install guide definitely belongs into the tutorials section, but whether it should be here at all (because the software has this already documented) is something we still need to discuss (I'd vote for not documenting it here again if the software itself already documents it sufficiently).